If a directive-change as proposed is unclear, ambiguous, paradoxical, or destructive of operations, or if it arguably consists of two or more directive-changes compounded or is an amendment that makes no difference, or if it is otherwise of questionable value, then the other employees may suggest amendments or argue against the proposal before the vote. A reasonable time must be allowed for this debate. The proponent decides the final form in which the proposal is to be voted on and, unless the Judge has been asked to do so, also decides the time to end debate and vote.